Böcker av Christian Benne

This book addresses the dynamic interplay between creativity and continuity in communication.Though conventionalisation is essential to any understanding of the foundation of interaction and language, thus far it has not been the subject of any substantial collective effort. New research presented here seeks to redress this. An introductory chapter critically reviews the theoretical assumptions and pitfalls of twentieth-century approaches to communication and conventionalisation. The successive chapters are by scholars from different theoretical backgrounds within language and literature. They study the processes of conventionalisation from the complementary perspectives of linguistic and literary research traditions and cover a diverse field of cognitive, social, and historical aspects of language.The target readership of the book is scholars and students of language and communication – including literacy and literary studies and philosophy of language – who are interested in foundational issues and their profound implications for empirical analysis.

In der Reihe Klassiker Auslegen"e; werden die bedeutendsten Werke der Philosophiegeschichte in Form kooperativer Kommentare von international renommierten Philosophen unter verschiedenen Blickwinkeln entschlusselt und kommentiert. Dabei folgen samtliche Bande der Reihe dem inneren Aufbau der betreffenden Klassikerwerke. In 12 bis 15 Beitragen erschlieen sich unter verschiedenen Blickwinkeln die groen Themen der Philosophie ohne den zeitraubenden Gang durch die Sekundarliteratur und bilden so eine Pflichtlekture fur Studierende, Hochschullehrer und Forscher.

"e;It is not for nothing that one has been a philologist, perhaps one is a philologist still!"e; - Throughout his work, Nietzsche has paid numerous tributes to philological scholarship. On the basis of a wide variety of sources, this study undertakes to demonstrate the deep impact of the historical-critical philology in which he had been trained. Nietzsche did not abandon philology in favour of philosophy but openly acknowledged his debt to its methods, especially in his later writings. This insight contributes to a reassessment of central concepts like text, genealogy, interpretation, or perspectivism, and it leads to a rejection of standard accounts in the theory of interpretation as well as in the history of scholarship. The book pleads for literary scholarship grounded in sceptical philology.