Böcker av Plato

The Republic is a Socratic dialogue, written by Plato around 380 BC, concerning justice, the order and character of the just city-state, and the just man. It is Plato's best-known work, and has proven to be one of the world's most influential works of philosophy and political theory, both intellectually and historically.In the dialogue, Socrates talks with various Athenians and foreigners about the meaning of justice and whether the just man is happier than the unjust man. They consider the natures of existing regimes and then propose a series of different, hypothetical cities in comparison, culminating in Kallipolis, a city-state ruled by a philosopher king. They also discuss the theory of forms, the immortality of the soul, and the role of the philosopher and of poetry in society.

Plato's Phaedo is a philosophical dialogue that recounts the final moments of the Greek philosopher Socrates's life and his discussions on the immortality of the soul. The dialogue centres around the philosophical argument for the existence of an immortal soul and the nature of death. Socrates presents his theory that the soul is eternal and separable from the physical body, suggesting that it continues to exist after death. Plato explores several philosophical ideas through the dialogue, such as the theory of forms, the nature of reality, and the concept of the soul's journey after death. The dialogue reflects Plato's belief in the existence of a realm of eternal and unchanging forms, which the soul can access through reason and contemplation. It invites readers to contemplate the nature of reality, the pursuit of wisdom, and the potential transcendence of the soul beyond the physical realm.

Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, made significant contributions to the field of philosophy, including his exploration of laws and their role in society. In his dialogue "The Laws," he delves into the concept of justice and the ideal construction of laws to create a just society. Plato's perspective on laws revolves around the idea that they should reflect and promote virtue, order and the common good of society. He argues that laws should be based on reason and the understanding of universal principles rather than arbitrary decisions made by individuals. Plato's exploration of laws serves as a cornerstone in the study of ethics, political science, and the philosophy of law.

Plato's Cratylus is a philosophical dialogue that examines the nature of language, its relationship to reality, and the role of names and words in conveying meaning. Socrates engages in a discussion with Cratylus, who argues that names have an inherent connection to the objects they represent. Hermogenes contends that names are arbitrary conventions agreed upon by humans, lacking any inherent connection to their referents. Plato explores the question of whether language is a mere convention or if it has a deeper relationship with reality. Through Socratic dialogue, he investigates the nature of language, the power of names, and the possibility of a true and correct language that accurately reflects the world. The dialogue raises profound questions about the nature of language and its relationship to truth and knowledge. It invites readers to reflect on the power and limitations of language, the process of naming, and the complex relationship between words and the world they seek to describe.

Plato's Symposium is a philosophical work that explores the nature of love, desire, and the pursuit of wisdom. It takes the form of a dialogue among a group of prominent Athenians gathered at a symposium, where each speaker presents different perspectives on love and its manifestations. Plato delves into the idea that true love goes beyond mere physical attraction and encompasses the quest for wisdom and the transcendence of the individual self. He presents the concept of "Platonic love," which transcends physical beauty and aims for a higher, more abstract form of love rooted in intellectual and spiritual connection. Through vivid and engaging dialogue, Plato invites readers to contemplate the nature of love and its profound impact on individuals and society. Symposium remains a timeless philosophical work that continues to inspire discussions on the nature of love, desire, and the pursuit of wisdom.

Plato's Theaetetus is a philosophical dialogue that explores the nature of knowledge, perception, and the definition of truth. It takes its name from its central character, Theaetetus, a young mathematician whose understanding of knowledge is challenged and examined by Socrates. Through a series of thought experiments and philosophical arguments, Plato explores different theories of knowledge, including sensory perception, rationalism, and the nature of concepts and definitions. The dialogue delves into topics such as the role of perception in acquiring knowledge, the relationship between true belief and knowledge, and the limitations of human understanding. The dialogue challenges conventional notions of knowledge and invites readers to critically examine their own understanding of truth and certainty. It remains a significant work in the field of epistemology and continues to influence discussions on the nature of knowledge and perception.

Lysis by Plato has been regarded as significant work throughout human history, and in order to ensure that this work is never lost, we have taken steps to ensure its preservation by republishing this book in a contemporary format for both current and future generations. This entire book has been retyped, redesigned, and reformatted. Since these books are not made from scanned copies, the text is readable and clear.

Parmenides, has been considered important throughout human history. In an effort to ensure that this work is never lost, we have taken steps to secure its preservation by republishing this book in a modern format for both current and future generations. This complete book has been retyped, redesigned, and reformatted. Since these books are not scans of the authors' original publications, the text is readable and clear.

Menexenus, has been considered important throughout human history. In an effort to ensure that this work is never lost, we have taken steps to secure its preservation by republishing this book in a modern format for both current and future generations. This complete book has been retyped, redesigned, and reformatted. Since these books are not scans of the authors' original publications, the text is readable and clear.

The Apology by Plato is a description of the statement Socrates gives during his trial. Socrates is accused of creating new gods and ruining Athens' young. By no means is Socrates' speech an ""apology"" in the sense we use today. Socrates generally uses extremely simple, conversational language.Socrates compares himself to a gadfly stinging a lethargic horse, the Athenian state, in The Apology of Socrates. He then starts questioning Meletus, who was essentially in charge of presenting Socrates to the jury. This is one of the rare times Socrates employs the cross-examination technique, or questioning, which is so prevalent in most Platonic dialogues.He makes the lighthearted suggestion that if he were to receive what he merits, he should be rewarded with a delectable feast for his significant contributions to the state. He claims that only the gods know what occurs after death when the jury rejects his recommendation and executes him.

Socrates and Phaedrus, an interlocutor in multiple dialogues, engage in a conversation in Plato's work The Phaedrus. Like Plato's Republic and Symposium, The Phaedrus was probably written around 370 BCE. Although the dialogue is apparently about the subject of love, it actually focuses on the art of rhetoric and how it should be used, as well as topics as varied as metempsychosis (the Greek belief in reincarnation) and sensual love. The classic Chariot Allegory, which depicts the human soul as consisting of a charioteer, a good horse heading upward to the divine, and a bad horse tending downhill to a material incarnation, is one of the dialogue's key passages. Unusually, the dialogue doesn't establish itself as a recounting of the day's events. The dialogue is presented in the straight, unmediated words of Socrates and Phaedrus; there are no intermediaries to set up the discussion or provide background information; it is delivered firsthand, as though we are present for the actual occurrences. This contrasts with dialogues like the Symposium, in which Plato openly provides us with a partial, fifth-hand account of the day's events by creating a number of layers between them and what we hear about them.

Plato's conversation is known as Cratylus (Ancient Greek: Kratylos). In it, Socrates is questioned about whether names are ""conventional"" or ""natural,"" or if language is merely a set of random signals, or if words have an essential connection to the things they symbolize. The majority of contemporary academics concur that it was mostly composed during Plato's supposedly middle era.As an artist employs color to convey the core of his topic in a painting, Socrates compares the production of a word to the labor of an artist in Cratylus. The best way to talk is to use names that are similar to the things they name (that is, names that are appropriate for them), and the worst way to speak is to use names that are not like the things they name.According to one theory, names have developed owing to tradition and convention, thus individuals who use them can replace them with something unrelated. The opposite approach holds that names come about because they express the essence of their topic. Many of the terms that Socrates gives as examples may have originated from a concept that was formerly associated with the name, but they have since evolved.