Temporality and Progress in Victorian Literature

[Headline]Argues that Victorian literature uses traces of a lingering past to theorise time as non-progressive and discontinuous For decades, the dominant view in Victorian studies has been that the period's economic, political and intellectual developments led to a broad sense that time was defined by continuous improvement - and that this master-narrative of progress was evident across Victorian writings. McAdams challenges this thesis by considering how the irregular life-cycles of individuals and objects undermine Victorian progress. Unfashionable waistcoats, aging courtesans and remembered conversations in Victorian literature instead reveal numerous alternative conceptions of time theorised against the emerging dominance of a progress narrative. Temporality and Progress in Victorian Literature uncovers the heterogenous shapes of time imagined by Victorian literature - regress, cyclicality, stasis and rupture. These shapes are not simply progress's others, but rather constituent elements of progress's theorisation. [bio]Ruth M. McAdams is a Senior Teaching Professor in the English Department at Skidmore College, USA. Her research examines questions of temporality and history in Victorian fiction and life-writing. Her articles have appeared in Victorian Studies, Victorian Literature and Culture, Nineteenth-Century Contexts and Pedagogy.